Where does Harima Nishi Coastal Line run?

Harima Nishi Coastal Line is recorded in Japan. Global Energy Monitor reports no start and end points for it.

How long is Harima Nishi Coastal Line?

Harima Nishi Coastal Line is 7 km long.

How much gas can Harima Nishi Coastal Line carry?

No design capacity is reported for Harima Nishi Coastal Line. That is an absent figure, not a zero.

Is Harima Nishi Coastal Line operating?

Harima Nishi Coastal Line is operating, having started in 1986.

Who owns Harima Nishi Coastal Line?

Harima Nishi Coastal Line is owned by Osaka Gas Co Ltd, as recorded in the current tracker release.

Does Harima Nishi Coastal Line serve an LNG terminal?

Harima Nishi Coastal Line passes within 25 km of 1 tracked LNG terminal. Proximity is not proof of a physical connection; each match is listed with its distance and how it was made.

Harima Nishi Coastal Line — gas pipeline, Japan

Route

No route geometry is available for this pipeline in the current release, so it is not drawn on the map. Start and end points below are shown where GEM reports them.

From: Not reported
To: Not reported
Start country: Japan
End country: Japan
Countries crossed: Japan
Onshore / offshore: Not reported
Fuel: Gas
Region: Not reported
Route drawn on map: Not reported
GEM pipeline ID: P1562
Start year: 1986
GEM wiki page: gem.wiki

Segments

Each row is one row of GEM's pipeline file. Project-level figures repeated on every segment are counted once in the totals above.

Segment	Status	From → to	Length	Capacity	Diameter	Start	Route from
Whole pipeline	Operating	Not reported	7	Not reported	15240 mm	1986	No route

Connected LNG terminals

Terminals whose coordinates fall within 25 km of this route, or whose name matches the pipeline. Proximity is not proof of a physical connection.

Terminal	Country	Import / export	Status	Distance	Matched by
Coastal Bend LNG Terminal	United States	Export	Proposed	—	name match

Owners and operators

Stakes as reported by GEM per segment, merged across segments.

Owners

Osaka Gas Co Ltd100%

Parent companies

Osaka Gas Co Ltd100%

In the news

Recent headlines that name Harima Nishi Coastal Line. Matched by name, so it is approximate. Titles and links only; we store no article text.

See all tracked headlines.

Common questions

Generated from the same tracker fields as the tables above, so the two cannot disagree. Each answer stands on its own.

Where does Harima Nishi Coastal Line run?: Harima Nishi Coastal Line is recorded in Japan. Global Energy Monitor reports no start and end points for it.
How long is Harima Nishi Coastal Line?: Harima Nishi Coastal Line is 7 km long.
How much gas can Harima Nishi Coastal Line carry?: No design capacity is reported for Harima Nishi Coastal Line. That is an absent figure, not a zero.
Is Harima Nishi Coastal Line operating?: Harima Nishi Coastal Line is operating, having started in 1986.
Who owns Harima Nishi Coastal Line?: Harima Nishi Coastal Line is owned by Osaka Gas Co Ltd, as recorded in the current tracker release.
Does Harima Nishi Coastal Line serve an LNG terminal?: Harima Nishi Coastal Line passes within 25 km of 1 tracked LNG terminal. Proximity is not proof of a physical connection; each match is listed with its distance and how it was made.

More gas pipelines in Japan

Listed in name order among the 118 pipelines tracked in Japan, so projects with the same name sit together. A browse aid, not a claim that they are alike.

Background on the technology and the terms used on this page.

LNG against pipeline gas
A pipeline delivers gas at lower cost than LNG over land up to roughly two to four thousand kilometres, beyond which liquefaction wins, and across any significant body of deep water LNG usually wins at any distance.
How LNG works
Liquefied natural gas is natural gas chilled to about minus 162 degrees Celsius, at which point it becomes a liquid roughly 600 times smaller than the gas, so it can be shipped where no pipeline runs.
What terminal status actually means
A project status describes how far an LNG terminal or train has progressed, and the gap between proposed and operating is the single most misread number in the industry.