Tool
Compare two LNG terminals
Pick any two of the 813 terminals in the tracker and see them side by side. Shown below: the two largest LNG export terminals, as a starting example.
Pick two terminals
Side by side
| Sabine Pass LNG Terminal | QatarEnergy LNG (N) | |
|---|---|---|
| Country | United States | Qatar |
| Facility type | Export | Export |
| Onshore / floating | Not reported | Not reported |
| Status | Operating | Operating |
| Operating capacity | 59.9 Mtpa | 40.8 Mtpa |
| Under-construction capacity | Not reported | Not reported |
| Proposed capacity | 20 Mtpa | Not reported |
| Tracked trains / phases | 8 | 4 |
| Earliest start year | 2008 | 1996 |
| Owners | Cheniere Energy | ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Mitsui & Co., QatarEnergy and 2 more |
Full detail, including chokepoint exposure and connected pipelines, is on each terminal's own page — linked in the table header once two terminals are selected.
Common questions
Each answer stands on its own.
- What does this tool compare?
- Facility type, current status, capacity by status, unit count, earliest start year and recorded owners for any two LNG terminals in the current tracker release, shown side by side.
- Why does capacity show as several figures rather than one?
- Because operating, under-construction and proposed capacity are never added together anywhere on this site — a proposed train may never be built, and combining them would produce a number that describes no real state of the world. Each status is shown on its own.
- Are all owners shown for a terminal with many stakeholders?
- Up to four are listed, with the total count noted if there are more, rather than silently dropping names past a limit — see the terminal's own page for the complete list.